British Social Realism vs. Hollywood
British Social
Realism vs. Hollywood
British Social Realism
|
Hollywood
|
Grainy
|
Glossy
|
Low Budget
|
Big Budget
|
Real social issues
|
Fantasy
|
Screened on TV/Online
|
Theatrical release
|
Unknown/upcoming actors
|
Famous actors
|
Bleak
|
Glamorous
|
Real life sets
|
Studio sets
|
Low advertising budget
|
Heavily marketed/ promoted
|
Seek change/ Social justice
|
Predictable endings
|
Various lengths
|
Standard feature length (100 mins)
|
Not many special effects
|
Special effects (sfx)
|
Low production value
|
High production value
|
British social realism is a film style which focuses on
contemporary topics in modern day society, most British social realism films
convey topics such as drugs, abuse, violence, sex and other gritty subjects,
some even concern very political and religious views and can be very
controversial. Whereas Hollywood films is the term used to describe films which
are produced in America. This genre is a polar opposite to the genre of British
social realism, with complete different characteristics in the category, the
most obvious example being the extreme difference in budgets; Hollywood films
are usually very expansive and have huge budgets to cover the costs of all the
famous actors/actresses, the sets, props, special effects etc. whereas social
realism films have a reasonably lower budget with lower exposure in the sense
of glitzy premieres and usually have very low quality production because one,
they generally can’t afford it and two, because the lower quality images
actually convey the gritty, hard-hitting context more because their set to be
as realistic as possible. Hollywood
films are most likely to have a fantasy setting and very unrealistic
characters, which is a way of getting the audience lost in a new world, this is
why these types of films have such huge budgets and are very glossy and have
predictable endings because the genre is all about making the film immersive
and glowing to the audience.
Comments
Post a Comment